Trillonzine

Artistic Subtlety In Nude Art, VS Purely Pornographic Nudity – Is Subtle Body Art Triumphing Over Body Addictive Content?

Is implied nudity becoming the more saucier of the style of model photography on a net based economy of photography?

With the arise of social media, in a land where everyone can now produce a eye-catching photo with the right software, what is the need of the higher edge work of true photographers?

As this change for the need for “art” and artistic photography has become more of a niche market only for those who actually appreciate the craft.

The taste of the fine art has become only tasty for those who have the knowledge of what it means to appreciate. The rest would seem more ignorant of acknowledging the skill it takes to truly organize and capture a breath taking photo.

That skill, one used and honed by the photographer seems only appreciated by businesses and companies, while the masses could care less now-a-days. This is because everyone has a camera in their pocket and their are plenty of ways to fabricate skill.

As things become more streamlined and less requiring of actual skill, the market for such a thing depreciates, along with its value.

One of these very particular niches of the photographic art is nude art- the artistic nude rendering of the human body. This in particular, the female body.

Just like everything caught in the void of the internet, even this once very respected skill of craft has indeed become watered down and without respect.

One of the trends which has watered down such artistic rendering of the human body in its natural state is porn, both commercial and individually centered.

In such ways nude art in itself has become quantity over quality.

Those who embody the majority are the ones who choose quantity, why? Because there’s so much and it’s so easy that there’s no time to stop and appreciate one thing before you’re off to the next ad profile.

Such is not the characteristic trait of a artistic appreciator but that of a addict.

Unfortunately, addiction has become a norm and is no longer something truly taboo. It’s part of mainstream life really. We all binge on something at times, do we not?

With the wave of boobies and butts addiction comes the washing away of the appreciation of the body itself. It’s almost like it’s only about the chasing of the next high, that next extreme.

There comes a time when even the simple nudity of a subject can’t even manage to peak an interest. Nudity, plus what? What happens after the subject is naked?

Nudity, when it’s so available in mass created as something commercialized becomes nothing. Just a blur of flesh which has no value unto itself.

Too much of anything takes what is special away from it. It simply becomes ordinary. Mundane, expected, or even dry.

So, with that being said, what is it that can return that special spark? The spark of bringing the artistic back in the mundane?

What about the subtle-sexiness? What about the tease? Or even simply the implication of nudity without the full reveal?

Is it possible that the thrilling tension of the reveal, without the fullness of it can bring back that spark of sensation which creates the allure lost in nude art?

Now, this isn’t to say that there are no currently existing forms of nude art photography which are simply incredible, but these artistic examples can be very hard to find.

The internet can become a red-ocean of content very quickly. The deeper the ocean of content surrounding any particular thing, the harder it becomes to find quality work.

Why do I even imagine that the implication of nudity can even possibly be more profound than that of a fully revealed body? This would be the same reason you watch a show to find out some bit of information, yet you’re strung along until the very end. This is done purposefully because the show runners know that your interest will be at its peak right up until you find out what’s going on.

On the flip-side, if you were revealed that little bit of information you have been waiting for right in the first five minutes of the show, what’s the probability that you’ll still watch with the same excitement?

It can be said to be the same with art, implication over just plain exposing with no character, no art to it.

A model can amass a large following just by going to the edge of full nudity, but not quite ever crossing the line. This style builds a tension which is never fulfilled, yet because of this tension your interest is peaked.

If that same model decides to fully reveal later on, giving her audience that fulfillment then it will at that point be much greater than if you didn’t have stick around to wait for it.

One double-click to full pay-off essentially ruins the value of the subject because there’s no long tension build up, no story, no personality.

If you never get the chance to get to know the person of subject, why would there be value in seeing their full natural self with all their flaws included?

If a stranger walked up and flashed their body to you and simply walked-on how much would that effect you? You might be awkwardly surprised and in shock, maybe even wanting more, yet that would be the height of it. A large shock with an extremely short burn of interest.

If one of your long time friends however did the same thing, there would be a completely different feeling to it, would there not be?

It’s about the value the subject has before you’re able to get to know them on their most intimate level. No value, little reward, little interest.

It’s the exact practice of models who have no value in the eyes of audience exposing their bodies in the pornographic sense which completely devalues this experience. When you take the work out of the job, when you take the waiting out of the reveal, in the artistic sense, you render it completely empty.

The internet is filled full of empty renderings, because of that the process of artistic discovery has been ruined for the corruption of the art for the use of monetization.

The viewing of the highly corrupted, the completely gutted of what once was an subtle art, has in the same sense corrupted the very brains of those who could possibly appreciate the art.

The corruption removes the art, for the sake of money. Just like a drug it triggers the brain to work outside of natural processes, and instead work by the urges of addiction.

Rounding off the argument, and noting all of these things, if you return to subtle sensibilities- if you just tease the senses a bit, you can return art to the genre.

This is what is being said as just how subtle nudity, yet non-revealing nudity can be the new return to old sensibilities.

In theory, it only takes a little corruption to completely ruin a good thing. Yet once that corruption is squeezed out, and the corrupt see that there is no way for them to maximize gain they will move on to other ventures.

The subtle nudity, doing away with the brazen and vulgar nature of corruption of the art is the new way to return to old values.

Giving something to be hoped, or yearned for within the depths of the soul is the spark of interest. It’s the spark of art, and the truth of the nature.

To truly have someone care about your art for more than three minutes, you must build that care. You must create an interest, nurture it, feeding it slowly yet without giving in to that pay-off until either you do or don’t decide to let your art be seen.

If we can return to the nature of the art, the life in the blood of such industry and human interest, we can return the part which gives it value, and extinguish the disease.

Model Link | Diandra Janelle

Try to look at the human form from an artistic perspective, one which tells the viewer a story, rather than simply an object used for a quick thousand-bucks.

A body of art has an incomparible value, while a body of payment alone will always be valued only for how much profit it’s capable of making.

Art increases and can be appreciated through the centuries, while corruption for monetary value will only depreciate with every day that passes.

This is what is meant by saying the subtle has a potential which cannot be estimated, while the opposite is quickly set at a dollar amount, exchanged for, and promptly forgotten.

Art is always the one which survives. It’s this art which tantalizes the senses. Let’s support and encourage more true art.

Leave a Reply

error: xx001277 xxx x-)
%d bloggers like this: